CARDENAS v. AT&T CORP.

Nos. 00-1915, 00-2353.

245 F.3d 994 (2001)

Jesse CARDENAS, Appellee, v. AT&T, CORP.; Lucent Technologies, Inc., Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Filed: April 4, 2001.

Rehearing and Rehearing Denied May 22, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David J. Rowland, argued, Chicago, IL (Sari M. Salmuddin, James M. Staulcup, Jr., Lisle, IL, on the brief), for appellant.

Eric B. Brown, argued, Lincoln, NE, for appellee.

Before: LOKEN and MAGILL, Circuit Judges, and BATTEY, District Judge.


Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied May 22, 2001.*

MAGILL, Circuit Judge.

Jesse Cardenas sued his employer, Lucent Technologies, Inc. ("Lucent"), alleging that its continuing failure to promote him to a supervisory position constituted age and national origin discrimination under the ADEA and Title VII, and that Lucent's promotion policies and procedures had a discriminatory impact upon Hispanics and Mexican-Americans. The district...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases