1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 259 F.3d
  5. 259 F.3d 979 (2001)
 

DOE I v. OTTE

No. 99-35845.

259 F.3d 979 (2001)

John Doe I, Jane Doe, and John Doe II, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Ronald O. Otte and Bruce M. Botelho, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Opinion Filed April 9, 2001.

As Amended July 24, 2001 and August 8, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Darryl L. Thompson, Esq., Anchorage, Alaska, for plaintiffs-appellants John Doe I and Jane Doe.

Verne Rupright, Esq., Wasilla, Alaska, for plaintiff-appellant John Doe II.

Kenneth M. Rosenstein, Assistant Attorney General, Anchorage, Alaska, for the defendants-appellees.

Before: Dorothy W. Nelson, Stephen Reinhardt and Sidney R. Thomas, Circuit Judges.

Argued and Submitted August 1, 2000 — Anchorage, Alaska

OPINION

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

This case involves an extremely sensitive and difficult question, both from a social and legal standpoint. How may society deal with convicted sex offenders after they have been punished for their crimes? How can society protect itself against future offenses and at the same time safeguard the constitutional rights of persons who have...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases