1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 250 F.3d
  5. 250 F.3d 980 (2001)
 

ADAMS v. CITY OF BATTLE CREEK

No. 99-1543.

250 F.3d 980 (2001)

David ADAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF BATTLE CREEK, a municipal corporation; Jeffrey P. Kruithoff, an individual, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed: May 11, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Marshall W. Grate, ROBERTS, BETZ & BLOSS, Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Appellant.

John Patrick White, VARNUM, RIDDERING, SCHMIDT & HOWLETT, Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Appellees.

ON BRIEF: Marshall W. Grate, ROBERTS, BETZ & BLOSS, Grand Rapids, Michigan, for Appellant.

John Patrick White, VARNUM, RIDDERING, SCHMIDT & HOWLETT, Grand Rapids, Michigan, Clyde J. Robinson, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Battle Creek, Michigan, for Appellees.

Before: MERRITT, KRUPANSKY, and BOGGS, Circuit Judges.

Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206

MERRITT, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which BOGGS, J., joined.

KRUPANSKY, J. (pp. 987-93), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.

OPINION

MERRITT, Circuit Judge.

With certain exceptions, the federal wiretap act criminalizes and creates civil liability for intentionally intercepting electronic communications without a judicial warrant. This case was brought...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases