1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 92 Ohio
  5. 92 Ohio St.3d 30 (2001)
 

KROH v. CONTINENTAL GEN. TIRE INC.

No. 00-16.

92 Ohio St.3d 30 (2001)

KROH, APPELLANT, v. CONTINENTAL GENERAL TIRE, INC., APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 13, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Katherine C. Hart Smith, for appellant.

Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs, LLP, James D. Kurek and Eleanor J. Tschugunov, for appellee.

PFEIFER, J.

Plaintiff-appellant, Nancy O. Kroh, filed suit against defendantappellee, Continental General Tire, Inc. ("General Tire"), claiming that General Tire had discriminated against her because of her gender, in violation of R.C. 4112.02 and 4112.99. At the close of Kroh's case, General Tire moved for a directed verdict, claiming that Kroh had failed to establish a prima facie case of gender discrimination because the males with whom she compared herself were...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases