1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 287 A.D.2d
  5. 287 A.D.2d 939 (2001)
 

INGALSBE v. CHICAGO INSURANCE COMPANY

287 A.D.2d 939 (2001)

731 N.Y.S.2d 782

WARD W. INGALSBE, JR., Respondent, v. CHICAGO INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendants, and BERTHOLON-ROWLAND CORPORATION, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

Decided October 25, 2001.

Mugglin, J.

In our prior decision (270 A.D.2d 684, lv dismissed 95 N.Y.2d 849), we agreed with Supreme Court's conclusion that, under the facts presented, no legal malpractice coverage was available to plaintiff from either defendant Home Insurance Company (his insurer when the alleged malpractice occurred) or defendant Chicago Insurance Company (his insurer when the claim was made). We disagreed, however, with Supreme Court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases