1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 16 P.3d
  5. 16 P.3d 1208 (2001)
 

RLC INDUSTRIES v. SUN STUDS, INC.

(95-00537, 94-13809 and 94-10357; CA A103762)

16 P.3d 1208 (2001)

172 Or. App. 233

In the Matter of the Compensation of Conrid J. Paxton, Claimant. RLC INDUSTRIES, Petitioner, v. SUN STUDS, INC./Saif Corporation; Woolley Enterprises/Saif Corporation; and Conrid Paxton, Aller & Morrison/Saif Corporation, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided January 31, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles E. Bolen, Medford, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Hornecker, Cowling, Hassen & Heysell.

William Blitz argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent Woolley Enterprises.

David L. Runner, Salem, waived appearance for respondents SAIF Corporation and Sun Studs, Inc.

No appearance for respondents Conrid Paxton and Aller & Morrison.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG and KISTLER, Judges.

ARMSTRONG, J.

This case is before us on review for the second time. See SAIF Corporation v. Paxton, 154 Or.App. 259, 959 P.2d 634 (1998). In the current proceeding, RLC Industries (RLC) seeks reversal of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board that assigned responsibility for claimant's hearing loss to it under the last injurious exposure rule. We reverse.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases