MATTER OF BLAIR v. BAILEY


279 A.D.2d 941 (2001)

719 N.Y.S.2d 757

In the Matter of the Claim of AINSLEY BLAIR, Claimant, v. PERCIVAL BAILEY, Doing Business as NEW LAUNDROMAT, Appellant. UNINSURED EMPLOYERS' FUND, Respondent; WORKERS' COMPENSATION BOARD, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

Decided January 25, 2001.


Mugglin, J.

As claimant sat in the office area of the New Laundromat, owned by Percival Bailey, he was shot by Bailey's son, rendering him paralyzed from the chest down. Following the conclusion of the initial fact-finding hearing and despite finding that claimant failed to substantiate his claim that an employer-employee relationship existed, the Workers' Compensation Law Judge (hereinafter WCLJ) restored the matter to the calendar for further evidence. The employer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases