1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 29 P.3d
  5. 29 P.3d 1171 (2001)
 

MADDUX v. SAIF

98-08061; A109043

29 P.3d 1171 (2001)

175 Or. App. 603

In the Matter of the Compensation of Craig A. Maddux, Claimant. Craig A. MADDUX, Petitioner, v. SAIF CORPORATION, and Pepsi-Cola Bottling, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 8, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rex Q. Smith, Atlanta, GA, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

Jerome P. Larkin, Chicago, IL, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and DEITS, Chief Judge, and WOLLHEIM, Judge.

WOLLHEIM, J.

In this workers' compensation case, claimant petitions for review of an order on reconsideration of the Workers' Compensation Board that adhered to a prior order affirming SAIF's denial of claimant's knee claim. Claimant argues that the Board erred in holding that claimant did not meet his burden of proving that the right knee condition was compensable. The issue is whether substantial evidence supports the Board's finding that the medical evidence failed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases