1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 243 F.3d
  5. 243 F.3d 956 (2001)
 

HINEY PRINTING CO. v. BRANTNER

Nos. 99-4535, 00-3012.

243 F.3d 956 (2001)

HINEY PRINTING COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Jeannine BRANTNER, Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed: March 16, 2001.

Rehearing Denied April 26, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Daran P. Kiefer, Kreiner & Peters, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellant.

Mark C. Willis, Willis & Linnen, Akron, Ohio, for Appellee.

ON BRIEF: Daran P. Kiefer, Kreiner & Peters, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellant.

Mark C. Willis, Willis & Linnen, Akron, Ohio, for Appellee.

Before: MARTIN, Chief Judge; MOORE, Circuit Judge; TARNOW, District Judge.

Rehearing En Banc Denied April 26, 2001.

OPINION

BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Chief Judge.

Hiney Printing Company appeals, and Jeannine Brantner cross-appeals, the district court's grant of summary judgment in part to Hiney Printing and in part to Brantner in this ERISA action seeking enforcement of the terms of the subrogation and reimbursement provisions of Hiney's employee benefit plan. For the following reasons...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases