HARDING v. SUMMIT MEDICAL CENTER

No. C-00-3256 VRW.

136 F.Supp.2d 1052 (2001)

Dynice HARDING, Plaintiff, v. SUMMIT MEDICAL CENTER, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

March 23, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John E. Hill, Michael P. Guta, Law Offices of John E. Hill, Oakland, CA, for plaintiff.

Richard E. Brandt, Stephen L. Goff, Ann O'Connell, Jana N. Du Bois, McDonough, Holland & Allen, Sacramento, CA, for defendants.

Gordon D. McAuley, Hanson, Bridgett, Marcus, Vlahos & Rudy, San Francisco, CA, Aaron J. Leibovic, Gariann M. Weisenberg, Sherman Oaks, CA, for Health Advocates.


ORDER

WALKER, District Judge.

Currently before the court is a motion filed by defendant Summit Medical Center and joined by defendant Health Advocates to dismiss plaintiff Dynice Harding's first amended complaint. The court finds this motion appropriate for decision without oral argument. Civil LR 7-1(b). As a result, the hearing scheduled for March 22, 2001, at 2:00 pm is VACATED. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is GRANTED.

I

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases