1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 636 N.W.2d
  5. 636 N.W.2d 545 (2001)
 

STATE v. GROSSMAN

No. C8-00-459.

636 N.W.2d 545 (2001)

STATE of Minnesota, Petitioner, Appellant, v. Jay Joseph GROSSMAN, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

December 13, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mike Hatch, Atty. Gen., St Paul, James C. Backstrom, Dakota County Atty., Kathryn M. Keena, Asst. Dakota County Atty., Hastings, for appellant.

Robert D. Sicoli, Sarah M. Aho, Thompson, Sicoli & Aho, Ltd., Minneapolis, for respondent.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.

OPINION

LANCASTER, Justice.

This case involves application of the United States Supreme Court's holding in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), to Minnesota's patterned sex offender sentence enhancement statute, Minn.Stat. § 609.108 (2000).

Jay Grossman was convicted of, inter alia, first-degree criminal sexual conduct (fear of imminent great bodily harm) in violation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases