1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 254 F.3d
  5. 254 F.3d 925 (2001)
 

BOWEN v. AMOCO PIPELINE CO.

No. 00-7039.

254 F.3d 925 (2001)

Ernest BOWEN; Mary Bowen, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. AMOCO PIPELINE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

June 20, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen Ward, Gardere, Wynne, Sewell, LLP, and G. Steven Stidham, Sneed, Lang, P.C., (Brian S. Gaskill and Steven K. Balman, Sneed, Lang, P.C., and Steven J. Adams, Gardere, Wynne, Sewell, LLP, Tulsa, Oklahoma, with them on the briefs), appearing for Appellant.

Michael L. Darrah, Durbin, Larimore & Bialick, (Bill M. Roberts and Katherine T. Loy, Durbin, Larimore & Bialick, and Allan DeVore, The DeVore Law Firm, P.C., Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, with him on the brief), appearing for Appellee.

Before TACHA, Chief Judge, GIBSON, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

TACHA, Chief Judge.

Defendant Amoco Pipeline Company appeals from the district court's confirmation of an arbitration award. We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.

I. Background

I. Facts

In 1993, Ernest Bowen noticed an oily sheen in Flag Branch Creek, which is located on his property. After investigating the matter, the Oklahoma Corporate Commission (OCC) concluded remediation of the creek would be more...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases