1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 176 F.Supp.2d
  5. 176 F.Supp.2d 991 (2001)
 

INTEL CORP. v. VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

No. C 99-03062 WHA.

176 F.Supp.2d 991 (2001)

INTEL CORPORATION., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Taiwan corporation, and VIA Technologies, Inc., a California corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

December 5, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry A. Petri, Jr., John F. Lynch, Arnold White & Durkee, Houston, TX, Joseph Kattan, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, Washington, DC, James F. Valentine, Howrey Simon Arnold & White, LLP, Menlo Park, CA, Marc G. Schildkraut, Howrey Simon Arnold & White, LLP, Washington, DC, for Intel Corp.

Robert P. Feldman, Leo Cunningham, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Palo Alto, CA, John S. Ferrell, Carr & Ferrell LLP, Palo Alto, CA, for VIA Technologies, Inc., Taiwan Corp., VIA Technologies, Inc., California Corp.

ORDER GRANTING PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND OTHERWISE DENYING CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON ENFORCEABILITY OF UNITED STATES PATENT NO. 5,926,651

ALSUP, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

This patent-infringement action presents the important question of law whether patent applicants who knowingly and deceptively withhold material prior art from the Patent and Trademark Office during prosecution are immunized from the doctrine of patent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases