MAXWELL v. LANE COUNTY

2000-164; A114031.

35 P.3d 1128 (2001)

178 Or. App. 210

Norm MAXWELL, Petitioner, v. LANE COUNTY and Darin Gorham, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 28, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marianne Dugan, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the brief was Facaros & Dugan.

Stephen L. Vorhes, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent Lane County.

Corinne C. Sherton, Salem, argued the cause for respondent Darin Gorham. With her on the brief was Johnson & Sherton, P.C.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and LINDER and WOLLHEIM, Judges.


HASELTON, P.J.

Petitioner Norm Maxwell seeks judicial review of an order of the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA), which affirmed a decision of the Lane County Board of Commissioners approving an application for rezoning of property totaling approximately 32 acres from Rural Residential, 10-acre-minimum parcel size (RR-10), to Rural Residential, 5-acre-minimum parcel size (RR-5).1 Maxwell v. Lane County, 39 Or. LUBA 556 (2001). We...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases