STATE v. BARTEL-DAWSON

C990083MC; A107347

31 P.3d 1129 (2001)

176 Or. App. 519

In the Matter of Charlene Bartel-Dawson, Alleged to be a Mentally III Person. STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Charlene BARTEL-DAWSON, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 12, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Susan D. Isaacs, Beaverton, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Richard D. Wasserman, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and LINDER and WOLLHEIM, Judges.


PER CURIAM.

In this appeal of appellant's commitment to the custody of the Oregon Mental Health and Developmental Disability Services Division, the only issue is whether the trial court's failure to advise appellant at the hearing of her right to subpoena witnesses requires reversal. The state concedes that ORS 426.100(1)(d) requires such advice to be given at the hearing, a concession we accept.1 The state argues, however, that the error...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases