1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 147 F.Supp.2d
  5. 147 F.Supp.2d 1011 (2001)
 

IN RE INDIAN GAMING RELATED CASES

Nos. C 97-04693, C 98-01806 CW.

147 F.Supp.2d 1011 (2001)

In re INDIAN GAMING RELATED CASES Coyote Valley Band of Pomo Indians, Plaintiffs, v. The State of California, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

June 15, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eduardo G. Roy, Arter & Hadden LLP, San Francisco, CA, Bradley G. Downes, Office of Tribal Atty., Hoopa, CA, Thomas P. Schlosser, Morisset, Schlosser, Ayer & Jozwiak, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiffs.

Kenneth R. Williams, Sara J. Drake, Atty. General's Office, Sacramento, CA, for Defendant.

Richard G. McCracken, J. Thomas Bowen, Elizabeth A. Lawrence, Davis, Cowell & Bowe, San Francisco, CA, Art Bunce, Law Office of Art Bunce, Escondido, CA, Amicus Curiae.

AMENDED ORDER DENYING COYOTE VALLEY'S MOTION FOR AN ORDER PURSUANT TO 25 U.S.C. §§ 2710(d)(7)(B)(iii) and (iv)

WILKEN, District Judge.

This complaint was filed pursuant to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), 25 U.S.C. §§ 2701-2721. Plaintiff Coyote Valley Band of Pomo Indians (Coyote Valley) moves for an order requiring Defendant State of California to negotiate with it pursuant to 25 U.S.C. § 2710(d)(7)(B...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases