CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY and Three Rivers Biologicals, Inc., Plaintiffs,
v.
HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE, INC., Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., Roche Diagnostic Systems, Inc., Roche Biomedical Laboratories, Inc., Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, Inc., the Perkin-Elmer Corporation, Chiron Corporation, and Cetus Oncology Corporation, Defendants.
United States District Court, N.D. California.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 27, 2001.
June 27, 2001.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Daniel E. Alberti, Eugene J. Majeski, Ropers Majeski Kohn & Bentley, Redwood City, CA, Arland T. Stein, Reed Smith Shaw & McClay, Pittsburgh, PA, James M. Wagstaffe, Kerr & Wagstaffe, San Francisco, CA, for Carnegie Mellon University.
Daniel E. Alberti, Eugene J. Majeski, Ropers Majeski Kohn & Bentley, Redwood City, CA, Arland T. Stein, Reed Smith Shaw & McClay, Pittsburgh, PA, Walter P. DeForest, DeForest & Koscelnik, Pittsburgh, PA, for Three Rivers Biologicals, Inc.
Vanessa Wells, Heller Ehrman White & McAuliffe, Menlo Park, CA, Gidon D. Stern, S. Leslie Misrock, Stephen S. Rabinowitz, Pennie & Edmonds LLP, New York, NY, for Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., Roche Diagnostic Systems, Inc., Roche Biomedical Laboratories, Inc., The Perkin-Elmer Corporation, Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings.
Tamu K. Sudduth, Harold J. McElhinny, Constance T.Y. McComb, Morrison & Foerster LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Cetus Oncology Corporation, Chiron Corporation.
United States District Court, N.D. California.
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ILLSTON, District Judge.
On March 16, 2001, the Court heard argument on the Roche1 defendants' motion for summary judgment on their counterclaim for declaratory judgment that claims 1-19, 22-40 and 43-45 of the '708 patent are invalid. Having carefully considered the arguments of counsel and the papers submitted, the Court GRANTS the motion for the reasons set forth...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
