1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 243 F.3d
  5. 243 F.3d 906 (2001)
 

TEXACO EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTS v. AMCLYDE ENG. PROD.

No. 00-30799.

243 F.3d 906 (2001)

TEXACO EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION COMPANY and Marathon Oil Company, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AmCLYDE ENGINEERED PRODUCTS COMPANY, INC., et al., Defendants. AmClyde Engineered Products Company, Inc., Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. J. Ray McDermott, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Revised March 29, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

S. Gene Fendler (argued), David W. Leefe, Liskow & Lewis, New Orleans, LA, Philip G. Eisenberg, Texaco Group Inc., Houston, TX, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Charles M. Steen (argued), Stephen L. Williamson, John Thomas Nesser, IV, Stephanie G. McShane, Steen, McShane & Williamson, New Orleans, LA, for J. Ray McDermott, Inc.

Before GOODWIN, GARWOOD, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge:

At issue in this appeal is whether to carve out an exception to the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 9 U.S.C. § 3, where, in admiralty cases, its enforcement would deny a party the ability to implead a third-party defendant pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 14(c). We conclude that the policy of liberal joinder in maritime cases embodied in Rule 14(c) does not supersede the statutory...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases