Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
County Court properly denied the motion of defendant to suppress tangible evidence seized from his apartment pursuant to a search warrant that authorized any executing police officer to enter the apartment without giving notice of his authority and purpose (see, CPL 690.35 [4] [b]). Contrary to defendant's contention, the no-knock provision of the warrant was justified by more than the category of criminal...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
