1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 29 P.3d
  5. 29 P.3d 1104 (2001)
 

MULIER v. JOHNSON

(CC 16-96-09570; CA A100065; SC S47132)

29 P.3d 1104 (2001)

332 Or. 344

Vincent MULIER, Petitioner on Review, v. Mark JOHNSON, Lorraine Davis, Linda King, and University of Oregon, Respondents on Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided August 9, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David C. Force, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner on review.

Richard D. Wasserman, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause and filed the briefs for respondents on review. With him on the briefs were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Before CARSON, Chief Justice, and GILLETTE, DURHAM, LEESON, and RIGGS, Justices.

LEESON, J.

The sole issue on review in this civil action is whether the trial court erred in awarding attorney fees to defendant University of Oregon (University) after it had granted defendants' motion for summary judgment on all plaintiff's claims.1 The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's grant of summary judgment, but vacated and remanded the trial court's award of attorney fees.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases