1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 107 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 107 Cal.Rptr.2d 6 (2001)
 

EMID v. COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA

No. B141893.

107 Cal.Rptr.2d 6 (2001)

88 Cal.App.4th 781

EMBARCADERO MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA, et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Six.

Review Denied August 15, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Goodwin & Associates, Robert E. Goodwin, Magda Lopez, Livermore, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Stephen Shane Stark, County Counsel, Alan L. Seltzer, Chief Deputy, for Defendant and Respondent County of Santa Barbara.

Hatch and Parent, Stanley M. Roden, Steven A. Amerikaner, Joseph D. Allen, John D. Bakker, Santa Barbara, for Defendants and Respondents Goleta West Sanitary District and Santa Barbara Metropolitan Transit District.

COFFEE, J.

Defendant County of Santa Barbara (County) approved a resort hotel development on a 73-acre beachfront parcel north of the City of Santa Barbara. The parcel is within the boundaries of plaintiff Embarcadero Municipal Improvement District (EMID). The County conditioned its approval of the hotel on the annexation of the parcel to two other special districts, defendants Goleta West Sanitary District (Sanitary District) and Santa Barbara Metropolitan Transit...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases