1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 63 Conn.
  5. 63 Conn. App. 49 (2001)
 

AMRESCO NEW ENGLAND II, L.P. v. COLOSSALE

(AC 20259)

63 Conn. App. 49 (2001)

AMRESCO NEW ENGLAND II, L.P., ET AL. v. DOMINIC COLOSSALE ET AL.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Officially released April 24, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul N. Gilmore, with whom, on the brief, was Sara N. Robinson, for the appellant (substitute plaintiff).

Donald Gaudreau, for the appellees (named defendant et al.).

Foti, Spear and Peters, Js.

Opinion

PETERS, J.

The principal issue in this mortgage foreclosure action is whether a mortgagee can require a trial court to order a strict foreclosure on all the separate parcels covered by a blanket mortgage if a foreclosure limited to fewer than all parcels will satisfy the mortgage debt. Exercising its equitable discretion, the court ordered a limited strict foreclosure. The mortgagee challenges the validity of this order. The validity

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases