1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 27 P.3d
  5. 27 P.3d 1092 (2001)
 

WADDILL v. ANCHOR HOCKING, INC.

9405-03390; A91012.

27 P.3d 1092 (2001)

175 Or. App. 294

Arleen E. WADDILL, Respondent, v. ANCHOR HOCKING, INC., a Delaware corporation, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

July 11, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert H. Riley, Catherine Masters Epstein, Neil Lloyd, Schiff Hardin & Waite, Chicago, IL, and Stephen S. Walters and Stoel Rives LLP, Portland, for appellant.

Kathryn H. Clarke and D. Lawrence Wobbrock, Portland, for respondent.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and DEITS, Chief Judge, and ARMSTRONG, Judge.

EDMONDS, P.J.

This case concerns whether a manufacturer of fishbowls is liable to a consumer because of the failure of the manufacturer to warn that its fishbowls are subject to shattering after they acquire small cracks or dings during ordinary use. Plaintiff brought this action to recover for injuries that she suffered when a fishbowl that defendant manufactured shattered while she was carrying it. We originally reversed the judgment in favor of plaintiff and remanded...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases