ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, Plaintiff,
v.
ZENITH LABORATORIES, INC., Defendant.
United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
February 27, 2001.
February 27, 2001.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Paul H. Berghoff, McDonnell, Boehnen, Hurlbert & Berghoff, Chicago, IL, John R. Schaibley, III, Baker & Daniels, Indianapolis, IN, Thomas G. Slater, Jr., Hunton & Williams, Richmond, VA, Paul F. Ware, Jr., Goodwin Proctor & Hoar, LLP, Boston, MA, for plaintiff.
Stephen E. Arthur, Harrison & Moberly, Indianapolis, IN, William L. Mentlik, Lerner David Littenberg Krumholz & Mentlik, Westfield, NJ, Keith E. Rounsaville, Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler Alhadeff & Sitterson, Tampa, FL, Jay B. Shapiro, Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler Alhadeff & Sitterson, Miami, FL, for defendant.
United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division.
ENTRY ON ZENITH'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 287 AS TO LILLY'S HATFIELD PATENT CLAIM
BARKER, District Judge.
This cause is before the Court on the motion of defendant Zenith Laboratories, Inc. ("Zenith") entitled Zenith's1 Motion for Summary Judgment Under 35 U.S.C. § 287 as to Lilly's Hatfield Claim. The motion is fully briefed, and the Court, being duly advised, DENIES the motion...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
