1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 34 P.3d
  5. 34 P.3d 1080 (2001)
 

GRIFFEL v. REYNOLDS

No. 26115.

34 P.3d 1080 (2001)

136 Idaho 397

Lloyd GRIFFEL, Harshbarger Farms, Inc., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. David REYNOLDS and Gogie O. Reynolds, husband and wife, Defendants-Third Party Plaintiffs, and Roy Stegelmeier and Trudy Stegelmeier, husband and wife, Defendants Third-Party Defendants, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Idaho Falls, May 2001 Term.

October 24, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Smith & Hancock, Rexburg, for appellants. Jesse D. Hancock argued.

McGrath Meacham Smith & Seamons, Idaho Falls, for respondents. Bryan D. Smith argued.

WALTERS, Justice.

This case involves a boundary dispute, which arose when defendants David and Gogie Reynolds' (Reynolds) prepurchase survey demonstrated that plaintiffs' farming lines encroached on the parcel that Reynolds had purchased from Roy and Trudy Stegelmeier. The district court determined the location of the boundary by applying the doctrine of boundary by acquiescence. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In 1976, Stegelmeier entered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases