SMITH v. VETERINARY MEDICAL EXAMINING BD.

G60143; A109656.

27 P.3d 1081 (2001)

175 Or. App. 319

Heidi SMITH, D.V.M., Petitioner, v. VETERINARY MEDICAL EXAMINING BOARD, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 11, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence W. Erwin, Bend, argued the cause and filed the brief, for petitioner.

Mary Hazel Williams, Assistant Solicitor General, argued the cause, for respondent. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG and KISTLER, Judges.


EDMONDS, P.J.

Petitioner is a veterinarian who seeks judicial review of an order of the Oregon Veterinary Medical Examining Board (Board). The Board's order suspended her professional license for one year for professional misconduct under ORS 686.150(1). Petitioner contends, in one of multiple assignments of error, that the Board erred in relying on evidence that was submitted after the record of the hearing was closed, evidence that petitioner did not have an opportunity...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases