1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 173 F.Supp.2d
  5. 173 F.Supp.2d 931 (2001)
 

CITY OF ST. CLOUD v. DI MA CORP.

No. 00-CV-2376 JMR/RLE.

173 F.Supp.2d 931 (2001)

CITY OF ST. CLOUD v. DI MA CORP. and Malcolm, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Minnesota.

August 4, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James J. Thomson, Kennedy & Graven, Minneapolis, MN, Jan Farel Peterson, St. Cloud Atty's Office, St. Cloud, MN, Gary Niles Gustafson, St. Cloud, MN, for Plaintiff.

Randall D. B. Tigue, Tigue Law Office, Minneapolis, MN, for Defendants.

ORDER

ROSENBAUM, District Judge.

Plaintiff, the City of St. Cloud ("the City"), asks the Court to declare that its amortization ordinance is valid,1 and to enter an order enjoining defendants, Di Ma Corporation and Malcolm, Inc., from operating Pure Pleasure, an adult bookstore,2 in derogation of that ordinance. Defendants contend the amortization ordinance lacks the predicate findings necessary to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases