PACHL v. MORROW

99C11451; A106992

33 P.3d 1063 (2001)

177 Or. App. 540

Randol Lawrence PACHL, Appellant, v. Mitch MORROW, Superintendent, Oregon State Correctional Institution, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 31, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel C. Kauffman argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.

Lore Bensel, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG and KISTLER, Judges.


ARMSTRONG, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment that dismissed his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. He contends that he is unlawfully confined in prison as a result of an order of the Board of Parole and Post Prison Supervision (Board) that deferred his release on parole for two years. The Board based its order on a finding that plaintiff suffered from a present severe emotional disturbance that caused him to be a danger...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases