Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule that prohibits the unauthorized use of controlled substances or narcotic drugs after his urine twice tested positive for the presence of cannabinoids. Substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt was presented at his disciplinary hearing in the form of the misbehavior report and the positive urinalysis test results with supporting documentation (see, Matter of Jackson v Portuondo,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF SCHNITTKER v. SELSKY
288 A.D.2d 794 (2001)
733 N.Y.S.2d 752
In the Matter of EDWARD SCHNITTKER, Petitioner, v. DONALD P. SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing/Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided November 29, 2001.
Decided November 29, 2001.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
