U.S. v. HARDEMAN

No. 97-10516.

249 F.3d 826 (2001)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marvin Lee HARDEMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Opinion Filed March 21, 2000.

Order Amending Opinion Filed May 3, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David J. Cohen, Cohen & Paik, San Francisco, California, for the defendant-appellant.

Robert T. Swanson, Assistant United States Attorney, San Francisco, California, for the plaintiff-appellee.

Before: MARY M. SCHROEDER, JOHN T. NOONAN, and A. WALLACE TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.


Argued and Submitted February 15, 2000 — San Francisco, California.

PER CURIAM Opinion; Dissent by Judge NOONAN.

ORDER

A majority of the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing filed on behalf of the United States.

Our colleague Judge Noonan would grant the petition for rehearing on the ground that the speedy trial clock began to run anew for Hardeman on the date that one of his co-defendants was arraigned, which was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases