ILLINOIS CENT. R. CO. v. DUPONT

Nos. CIV.A. 00-500-D-M2, CIV.A. 00-834-D-M2, CIV.A. 01-459-D-M2, CIV.A. 01-460-D-M2.

190 F.Supp.2d 880 (2001)

ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY v. Ronald L. DUPONT, et al Charlie A. Price, et al v. Canadian National / Illinois Central Railroad Company, et al Fern Sheridan Roshto Dupuy Connor, et al v. Canadian National / Illinois Central Railroad Company, et al Ronald R. Graves v. Canadian National / Illinois Central Railroad Company, et al

United States District Court, M.D. Louisiana.

December 4, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas K. Williams, Cullen J. Dupuy, Thomas Richard Temple, Jr., Breazeale, Sachse & Wilson, Baton Rouge, LA, for Illinois Central Railroad Company, plaintiff.

Mary Kerrigan Dennard, Morgan J. Wells, Jr., Larzelere & Picou, LLP, Metairie, LA, for Donald L. Dupont, Northfield Ins. Co., defendants.

William C. Helm, Law Offices of William C. Helm, L.L.C., Baton Rouge, LA, Maurice Blake Monrose, Karen J. King, Hurlburt, Privat & Monrose, PLC, Lafayette, LA, for Denmar Logging, Inc., defendant.

Steven David Crews, Corkern & Crews, LLC, Natchitoches, LA, for Capital City Ins. Co., Inc., defendant.

Michael K. Nowak, Kujawski & Gaerber, Belleville, IL, Philip Bohrer, Bohrer Law Firm, Baton Rouge, LA, for Rhonda Chantel Dupuy Fern, Sheridan Roshto Dupuy Connor, Brian Michael Connor, Vikki Lynn Connor, Wayne A. Connor, Jr., consolidated plaintiffs.

Floyd J. Falcon, Jr., Avant & Falcon, Baton Rouge, LA, James H. Wettermark, Burge and Wettermark, Birmingham, AL, for Ronald R. Graves, Charles A. Price, Joe Ann Price, consolidated plaintiffs.

Joseph J. Bailey, Provosty, Sadler & deLaunay, Alexandria, LA, for Underwriters Ins. Co., consolidated defendant.

Michael O. Hesse, St. Francisville, LA, for Debra Dupont.


RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

BRADY, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on a motion for summary judgment (doc. 58) filed by defendant, Underwriters Insurance Company ("Underwriters").1 The matter has been fully briefed, and there is no need for oral argument. Subject matter jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship, 28 U.S.C. § 1332.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases