1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 766 A.2d
  5. 766 A.2d 292 (2001)
 

GRIFFIN v. TOPS APPLIANCE CITY, INC.

766 A.2d 292 (2001)

337 N.J. Super. 15

Darius GRIFFIN and Mary Griffin, Plaintiffs-Respondents/Cross-Appellants, v. TOPS APPLIANCE CITY, INC., Philip M. Schmidt, Philip J. Schoonover and Peter Huber, Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 25, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew J. Rothman, Newark, argued the cause for appellants/cross-respondents (Goldstein and Lem, attorneys; Mr. Rothman, on the brief).

Michael A. Spero, Princeton, argued the cause for respondents/cross-appellants (McCarthy and Schatzman, attorneys; Mr. Spero and Charly Gibbons, on the brief).

Before Judges SKILLMAN, WECKER and LESEMANN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by SKILLMAN, P.J.A.D.

Plaintiff Darius Griffin is a former employee of defendant Tops Appliance City, Inc. (Tops), who was discharged for selling a big screen television set to his brother-in-law for a price below cost. Plaintiff subsequently brought this action against Tops and three of its executives, defendants Phillip M. Schmidt, Phillip J. Schoonover and Peter Huber, claiming that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases