1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 795 A.2d
  5. 795 A.2d 260 (2001)
 

DONOFRY v. AUTONOTE SYSTEMS, INC.

795 A.2d 260 (2001)

350 N.J. Super. 276

Donald A. DONOFRY and Madeline E. Donofry, Plaintiffs-Respondents/Cross-Appellants, v. AUTOTOTE SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Respondent, Sital Singh DHANOA, Defendant-Cross-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided September 27, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth F. Oettle, Newark, argued the cause for appellant/cross-respondents (Sills Cummis Radin Tischman Epstein & Gross attorneys; Mr. Oettle, of counsel; Mr. Oettle and Debra M. Lightner, on the brief).

John M. Donnelly argued the cause for plaintiffs/cross-appellants (Levine, Staller, Sklar, Chan, Brodsky & Donnelly, attorneys; Mr. Donnelly of counsel; Mr. Donnelly, Scott J. Mitnick and E. Allan Mack, Atlantic City, on the brief).

Before Judges SKILLMAN, WECKER and LESEMANN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by WECKER, J.A.D.

This is defendant's appeal from a verdict entered after a bench trial on a whistleblower claim brought under the Conscientious Employees' Protection Act (CEPA), N.J.S.A. 34:19-1 to -8. Plaintiff cross-appeals the dismissal of his punitive damages claim as well as his tort claim against the individual defendant. The primary issues raised by this appeal are the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases