Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Under either the complainant's or the defendant's version of the facts, the trial court properly declined to charge petit larceny as a lesser-included offense of robbery in the third degree. Accepting the complainant's assertion that force was used, no reasonable view of the evidence would support a finding that the defendant committed the lesser crime of petit larceny but not the greater crime of robbery in the third degree...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.