Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
That branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony was properly denied. The defendant's detention for the purpose of a showup identification was based on reasonable suspicion that he had committed the recently reported robbery, which flowed from the totality of the information available to the police (see, People v Hicks,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.