PRINCE v. GARRUTO, GALEX & CANTOR


787 A.2d 245 (2001)

346 N.J. Super. 180

Brett J. PRINCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GARRUTO, GALEX & CANTOR, Esqs., a Partnership; Bryan D. Garruto, Esq.; Richard Galex, Esq.; and Robert G. Daroci, Esq., Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 27, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dennis A. Cipriano, West Orange, argued the cause for appellant, (Brett J. Prince, pro se, on the brief).

John D. North, Woodbridge, argued the cause for respondents, (Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith, Ravin, Davis & Himmel, attorneys; Mr. North, of counsel and on the brief; Robert Beckelman, Iselin, on the brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, WEFING and LESEMANN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by PRESSLER, P.J.A.D.

This is a legal malpractice case. Plaintiff Brett J. Prince appeals from a summary judgment dismissing his complaint against defendants, the law firm of Garruto, Galex, & Cantor, and several of their partners and associates. We reverse and remand.

The gravamen of plaintiff's legal malpractice action is the handling by defendants of his claims based upon the permanent discoloration of his teeth...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases