1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 170 F.Supp.2d
  5. 170 F.Supp.2d 853 (2001)
 

CUSTOM PRODUCTS CORP. v. INTERMET CORP.

No. 99-C-0158.

170 F.Supp.2d 853 (2001)

CUSTOM PRODUCTS CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. INTERMET CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin.

September 28, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel A. Kaplan, Sharon K. Mollman Elliott, Foley & Lardner, Madison, WI, Robert L. Binder, Elizabeth L. Wolf, Foley & Lardner, Milwaukee, WI, for plaintiff.

Scott W. Hansen, Dean E. Mabie, Christopher P. Banaszak, Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren, Norris & Rieselbach, Milwaukee, WI, Kenneth J. McIntyre, Richard A. Wilhelm, Scott T. Seabolt, Dickinson Wright, Detroit, MI, for defendant.

DECISION AND ORDER

RANDA, District Judge.

This contract dispute comes before the Court for decision after a trial to the Court. For the following reasons, judgment is awarded in defendant's favor.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The following facts are undisputed. Defendant Intermet Corporation ("Intermet") is located in Troy, Michigan, and Plaintiff Custom Product Corporation's ("CPC") is located in Oconomowoc, Wisconsin. Both parties are suppliers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases