1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 240 F.3d
  5. 240 F.3d 781 (2001)
 

TEXTILE UNLIMITED, INC. v. A..BMH CO., INC.

No. 00-56358.

240 F.3d 781 (2001)

TEXTILE UNLIMITED, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. A..BMH AND COMPANY, INC., a Georgia corporation, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed February 14, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark M. Kassabian and Jacqueline Bruce Chinery; Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue; Los Angeles, California, for the defendant-appellant.

William H. Y. Park, Michael Schillaci, Jeffrey T. Lowe; Kwak, Kim & Park; Los Angeles, California, for the plaintiff-appellee.

Before: Stephen S. TROTT, SIDNEY R. THOMAS and Marsha S. BERZON, Circuit Judges.

Argued and Submitted January 10, 2001, Pasadena, California

THOMAS, Circuit Judge:

In this appeal, we consider, inter alia, the proper venue for a suit to enjoin an arbitration. Under the circumstances presented by this case, we conclude that the Federal Arbitration Act does not require venue in the contractually-designated arbitration locale.

I

Textile Unlimited, Inc. ("Textile") claims that A..BMH and Company, Inc. ("A..BMH") is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases