ROE v. STATE

No. A093755.

113 Cal.Rptr.2d 900 (2001)

94 Cal.App.4th 64

John ROE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. The STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

November 30, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Matthew J. Witteman, Law Offices of Matthew J. Witteman, San Francisco, Attorneys for Appellant.

Bill Lockyer, Attorney General of the State of California, Pamela Smith-Steward, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Margaret A. Rodda, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tyler Pon, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Bradley Solomon, Deputy Attorney General, Attorneys for Defendants.


KLINE, P.J.

John Roe filed a complaint claiming the Office of Real Estate Appraisers violated a confidentiality clause in the stipulation by which an administrative disciplinary action against him was settled. The trial court sustained respondents' demurrer without leave to amend. Appellant contends the trial court abused its discretion because all his causes of action showed entitlement to relief or could have been amended to do so. We reverse.

STATEMENT...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases