1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 103 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 103 Cal.Rptr.2d 901 (2001)
 

ZOPPA v. ZOPPA

No. A090260.

103 Cal.Rptr.2d 901 (2001)

86 Cal.App.4th 1144

Celeste DELLA ZOPPA, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Joseph DELLA ZOPPA, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

February 5, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Brian D. Thiessen, Brian D. Thiessen, Alamo; Filice Law Offices and Gerald W. Filice, Sacramento, for Appellant.

Fershko, Lewis & Blevans, LLP, Robert E. Blevans and James R. Rose, San Jose, for Respondent.

HAERLE, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

This is an appeal from a summary judgment entered below in favor of the defendant and respondent in a Marvin-type of action.1 The trial court held that the Marvin doctrine did not apply because, notwithstanding the fact that the parties cohabited and, indeed, later married, the alleged agreement regarding respondent's property also anticipated appellant "bearing a child." The court concluded...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases