1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 131 F.Supp.2d
  5. 131 F.Supp.2d 870 (2001)
 

IN RE McTIGHE

No. 3:00-MC-101-D.

131 F.Supp.2d 870 (2001)

In re Paul F. McTIGHE, Jr.

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division.

February 13, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Vance Edward Ivy (argued) and Julie P. Wright of Gibson Ochsner & Adkins, Amarillo, TX, for McTighe.

Before ROBINSON, FITZWATER, and CUMMINGS, District Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The principal question presented in this reciprocal discipline matter is whether Paul F. McTighe, Jr., Esquire ("McTighe"), has presented a "grave reason" that is sufficient under the test of Selling v. Radford, 243 U.S. 46, 37 S.Ct. 377, 61 L.Ed. 585 (1917), not to suspend him from this court's bar based on his suspension from practice by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. Having conducted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases