Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the complainant's identification testimony should have been suppressed because the People did not produce the photograph binders from which she identified the defendant. However, since the defendant failed to raise this issue at the Wade hearing (see, United States v Wade,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.