1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 605 N.W.2d
  5. 605 N.W.2d 387 (2000)
 

K.R. v. SANFORD

No. C2-98-1377.

605 N.W.2d 387 (2000)

K.R., Respondent, v. Brandon SANFORD, et al., Defendants, The Committee, Inc., d/b/a First Avenue & 7th St. Entry, petitioner, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

February 3, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur, Chapman, Kettering, Smetak & Pikala, P.A., Paul A. Banker, Bassford, Lockhart, Truesdell, & Briggs, P.A., Minneapolis, for appellant.

Messerli & Kramer, P.A., James C. Wicka, Susan M. Coler, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Heard, considered and decided by the court en banc.

OPINION

RUSSELL A. ANDERSON, Justice.

In this appeal from summary judgment, we review the legal issue of whether a plaintiff, allegedly complicit in the illegal sale of alcohol, is barred from suit under the Civil Damages Act (CDA or Damages Act),1 or whether such complicity is fault to be compared under the Comparative Fault Act (CFA).2 We hold that the complicity of a plaintiff in the illegal sale...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases