PEOPLE v. DUCHESNE


94 N.Y.2d 892 (2000)

727 N.E.2d 1249

706 N.Y.S.2d 695

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RICHARD DUCHESNE, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided February 29, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Office of the Appellate Defender, New York City (Risa Gerson, Richard M. Greenberg and Rosemary Herbert of counsel), for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney of New York County, New York City (Sandra E. Cavazos and Patrick J. Hynes of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Chief Judge KAYE and Judges BELLACOSA, SMITH, LEVINE, CIPARICK, WESLEY and ROSENBLATT concur.


OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The record does not support defendant's assertion that the hearing court abused its discretion in balancing the applicable factors in conducting the Sandoval hearing in defendant's second trial. Defendant's remaining contention is without merit.

Order affirmed in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases