MATSUMOTO v. MATSUMOTO


762 A.2d 224 (2000)

335 N.J. Super. 174

Satoko MATSUMOTO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Tatsuya MATSUMOTO and Kazuko Matsumoto, Defendants-Appellants. Yasunori Matsumoto, Guardian ad litem/Cross-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 22, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Laurence H. Olive, Montclair, argued the cause for appellant Tatsuya Matsumoto and cross-appellant Yasunori Matsumoto.

Christopher O. Eriksen argued the cause for appellant Kazuko Matsumoto (Post, Polak, Goodsell & MacNeill, attorneys; John N. Post, Roseland, of counsel; Mary H. Post and Mr. Eriksen, on the brief).

Joseph J. Haskins, Jr., Fairview, argued the cause for respondent.

Before Judges STERN, RODRIGUEZ and COLLESTER.


The opinion of the court was delivered by STERN, P.J.A.D.

Defendants, Tatsuya Matsumoto and his mother Kazuko Matsumoto, appeal from an Amended Judgment of Divorce and from a separate order both entered on July 26, 1999. Yasunori Matsumoto, guardian ad litem of Hugo Matsumoto,1 appeals from a paragraph of the same judgment and from the denial of his motion for reconsideration on October...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases