1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 95 F.Supp.2d
  5. 95 F.Supp.2d 888 (2000)
 

MAYTAG CORP. v. WHIRLPOOL CORP.

No. 97C7559.

95 F.Supp.2d 888 (2000)

MAYTAG CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

April 27, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark T. Banner, Christopher J. Renk, J. Pieter van Es, Thomas K. Pratt, Banner & Witcoff, Ltd., Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff.

Kevin W. Guynn, Dennis A. Gross, Michael Leonard, Hill & Simpson, Chicago, IL, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, Senior District Judge.

This Markman ruling1 addresses the Counterclaim by Whirlpool Corporation ("Whirlpool") charging patent infringement by Maytag Corporation ("Maytag").2 That Counterclaim involves a variety of claim elements in United States Patents Nos. 5,165,433 and 5,803,1003

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases