ZAMBRANA v. CITY OF NEW YORK


94 N.Y.2d 887 (2000)

727 N.E.2d 573

706 N.Y.S.2d 76

AMY ZAMBRANA, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided February 17, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Proner & Proner, New York City (Tobi R. Salottolo of counsel), for appellant.

McCabe, Collins, McGeough & Fowler, Mineola (Patrick M. Murphy of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Chief Judge KAYE and Judges BELLACOSA, SMITH, LEVINE, CIPARICK, WESLEY and ROSENBLATT concur.


OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the majority memorandum of the Appellate Division. We further note that plaintiff failed to identify any triable issue of fact with respect to whether defendant had notice of the reckless conduct of other skaters in order to defeat defendant's motion for summary judgment (Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases