1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 206 F.3d
  5. 206 F.3d 756 (2000)
 

U.S. v. LILLY

No. 98-2991.

206 F.3d 756 (2000)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Larry M. LILLY, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided March 17, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark D. Stuaan, Donna R. Eide (argued), Office of the United States Attorney, Indianapolis, IN, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Linda M. Wagoner, James C. McKinley (argued), Indiana Federal Community Defenders, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before POSNER, Chief Judge, and BAUER and RIPPLE, Circuit Judges.

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.

In 1993, Larry M. Lilly was convicted of securities fraud and tax evasion. See 15 U.S.C. §§ 77q(a) & 77x and 26 U.S.C. § 7201. Five years later, in 1998, Mr. Lilly filed a "Petition for Clarification" in which he sought to have the district court declare that he had satisfied his restitution obligation. After the district court issued an order stating that Mr. Lilly had not, in fact, satisfied his restitution obligation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases