1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 120 F.Supp.2d
  5. 120 F.Supp.2d 842 (2000)
 

MEDIMATCH, INC. v. LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC.

No. C-99-3198 TEH.

120 F.Supp.2d 842 (2000)

MEDIMATCH, INC., and International Trading & Exchange, Inc., on behalf of themselves and on behalf of a class of other similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC., AT & T Corporation and AT & T Capital Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

October 24, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barry R. Himmelstein, Melanie M. Piech, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff.

Timothy P. Crudo, Dana N. Linker, Latham & Watkins, San Francisco, CA, James E. Tyrell, Jr., Joseph E. Hopkins, Scott Louis Weber, Latham & Watkins, Newark, NJ, for Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART, DENYING IN PART, DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS

HENDERSON, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

This is a consumer fraud action brought by plaintiffs MediMatch Corporation and Intrax Corporation on behalf of themselves and a potential class. MediMatch and Intrax purchased and/or leased a modest volume of business telephone products from the manufacturer, Lucent, and its financing affiliate, Newcourt. Plaintiffs' suit boils down...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases