1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 8 P.3d
  5. 8 P.3d 953 (2000)
 

IN RE COHEN

(OSB 95-83, 96-129; SC S39908)

8 P.3d 953 (2000)

330 Or. 489

In re Complaint as to the CONDUCT OF Richard D. COHEN, Accused.

Supreme Court of Oregon, En Banc.

Decided August 10, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jane E. Angus, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, Lake Oswego, argued the cause and filed the petition and reply brief for the Oregon State Bar. Jeffrey D. Sapiro, Disciplinary Counsel, Lake Oswego, filed a supplemental brief for the Oregon State Bar.

Robert A. Shlachter, Portland, argued the cause for the accused. Richard D. Cohen, Portland, filed the answering brief pro se. Robert A. Shlachter and Scott Shorr, of Stoll, Stoll, Berne, Lokting & Shlachter, P.C., filed a joint supplemental brief.

PER CURIAM.

In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar (the Bar) seeks review of a decision of a trial panel of the Disciplinary Board that reprimanded lawyer Richard D. Cohen (the accused) for violating Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rule (DR) 6-101(B)1 (neglect of a legal matter) and also continued his probation for an earlier violation of that same rule. The Bar seeks imposition of a 60-day suspension...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases